Tim Miller tells jurors James Elmore Jr. knew nonpublic details about Laura Miller

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Tim Miller testifies about his daughter Laura Miller during the James Elmore Jr. trial in Galveston County.
Tim Miller testifies Tuesday afternoon about Laura Miller’s disappearance and the information he says James Elmore Jr. gave him.

Tim Miller delivered emotional testimony Tuesday afternoon in the James Elmore Jr. trial. He described the day his daughter vanished and the 2022 call that changed the decades-old investigation.

Miller told jurors that Elmore knew details about Laura Miller and Audrey Cook that the public did not know. He also testified that Elmore described his alleged role in Laura’s death.

Elmore has pleaded not guilty. He faces a manslaughter charge in Laura Miller’s death. He also faces charges of tampering with the bodies of Miller and Cook.

Watch Tim Miller’s afternoon testimony below. This is the court video currently available for download. I will add any additional testimony when the remaining recordings become available.

Tim Miller describes Laura’s disappearance

Laura Miller reward flyer displayed as evidence during Tim Miller’s testimony in the James Elmore Jr. trial.
Prosecutors display a reward flyer for Laura Miller while Tim Miller testifies on September 1, 2026.

Laura Miller disappeared on September 10, 1984. She was 16 years old.

Tim Miller described the last morning he saw his daughter alive. He also told jurors about the 17 months he spent searching for answers.

Miller learned in February 1986 that investigators had found the remains of two young women near Calder Road. He took a newspaper article about the discovery to police.

Investigators later identified one of the victims as Laura.

Miller said he repeatedly returned to the field where investigators found her. He searched for her clothing and necklace. He also built a cross near the location.

Years later, Miller founded Texas EquuSearch. The organization has searched for missing people across the United States and in other countries.

Miller called the organization Laura’s legacy.

James Elmore contacted Texas EquuSearch

James Elmore Jr. sits with his defense team during testimony in his Galveston County trial.
James Elmore Jr. sits at the defense table during the afternoon testimony on September 1, 2026.

Miller testified that Elmore contacted Texas EquuSearch in April 2022. The message said Elmore wanted to discuss a missing-person case and “get some things off his chest.”

Miller called Elmore and asked which case he wanted to discuss.

According to Miller, Elmore named Laura Miller and Clyde Hedrick.

Miller then drove to Elmore’s home in Bacliff. Elmore asked him to take a ride to Calder Road.

Once there, Miller said Elmore pointed toward an area behind a church. Miller initially questioned whether Elmore had real information. The location of the so-called Killing Fields had received widespread attention.

That changed during their next stop.

Cemetery detail convinced Miller

Wooden cross marking the memorial for Laura Lynn Miller near Calder Road in League City, Texas.
A wooden cross stands in memory of Laura Lynn Miller near the site where her remains were found.

Miller testified that Elmore directed him to a home on Nevada Street in Dickinson. Hedrick once lived near the Miller family.

Elmore then directed Miller toward a nearby cemetery.

According to Miller, Elmore pointed toward trees and said Hedrick had hidden there to watch Laura when she visited the cemetery.

Miller said Laura’s visits to that cemetery were not public knowledge.

“That’s when I knew this guy was real,” Miller told jurors.

Miller asked Elmore whether he would speak with law enforcement. He then took him to an FBI office.

Miller recounts Elmore’s alleged statements

Prosecutor displays a map of Nevada Street showing Clyde Hedrick’s former Dickinson home during the James Elmore Jr. trial.
Jurors view a map showing Clyde Hedrick’s former home near the Miller family’s house in Dickinson.

Miller testified that Elmore slowly revealed more information during later conversations.

According to Miller, Elmore said Laura was with Hedrick and other men on the night she died. Miller testified that Elmore described mixing cocaine in a syringe and handing it to Hedrick.

Miller said Elmore claimed that he warned Hedrick not to inject Laura. According to Miller, Elmore then described watching Laura shake and take her final breath.

The state has accused Elmore of recklessly causing Laura’s death by preparing a syringe that contained cocaine and another substance.

Miller also testified about a shirt connected to the case. He said Elmore described the shirt before seeing a photograph of it.

According to Miller, that detail had never become public.

Testimony turns to Audrey Cook

Sign marking a recovery site featuring photos of four women and Clyde Hedrick during an investigation into multiple unsolved Texas homicide cases.
Memorial sign highlighting four victims whose cases have been linked to the same recovery site during the investigation into Clyde Hedrick and several unsolved homicides.

Miller said Elmore also provided details about Audrey Cook.

Cook’s remains were found near Calder Road in 1986. Investigators did not identify her until 2019.

Miller testified that he first visited the location with one of the people who found Cook’s body. Days later, he returned to the area with Elmore.

Miller said he did not tell Elmore where to go. According to Miller, Elmore walked to the same location and pointed toward the same tree.

Miller also testified that Elmore described Cook’s alleged shooting. He said Elmore identified the ammunition as a .22-caliber Federal hollow-point rifle bullet.

Miller told jurors that Cook’s autopsy findings were not public at that time.

Miller paid Elmore nearly $33,000

The defense will likely focus on money that Miller gave Elmore.

Miller testified that a reward offered $25,000 for information in Laura’s case. He said Elmore had already implicated himself and revealed key details before receiving any money.

Miller first gave Elmore $5,000. He later made additional payments.

In total, Miller said he gave Elmore nearly $33,000. That amount included the reward and additional money for Elmore’s personal and medical needs.

Miller denied paying Elmore to make the statements.

He said Elmore had information about Laura and other missing women. Miller also feared Elmore could die before investigators solved the case.

“He was the only one left,” Miller testified.

Recorded interview will play for jurors

Miller arranged a recorded interview with Elmore in 2022. He said he wanted to preserve the information because Elmore had discussed cancer and heart problems.

The interview lasts more than 90 minutes.

Prosecutors introduced the recording as evidence Tuesday afternoon. They plan to play it for jurors Wednesday.

Miller said he did not watch the video until two days before his testimony because it was too painful.

Miller says he believes Elmore

Miller continued communicating with Elmore for several years. He also connected Elmore with Hitchcock Police Detective Cory Williams.

According to Miller, Williams later began investigating the case and spoke directly with Elmore.

Prosecutors ended the afternoon by asking Miller whether he believed the information Elmore gave him.

“Yes, ma’am,” Miller answered.

They then asked whether he believes Elmore bears responsibility for Laura’s death.

Miller again answered, “Yes, ma’am.”

The defense has not yet cross-examined Miller.

Read my new book

My new book, When Two Worlds Collide During WWII, follows two families separated by war—one in Wisconsin and one in Germany—whose lives eventually collide in a way neither could have imagined. Order your copy on Amazon.

Traveling to Galveston County?

Visitors following the trial can compare lodging options through Hotels.com.

Long courthouse days can also mean keeping phones and reporting equipment charged. Courtroom and travel essentials are available through Amazon.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. I may also earn a commission from eligible Hotels.com bookings, at no additional cost to you.

Earlier coverage: Read what happened during Elmore’s pretrial hearing and why the judge said the Aug. 31 setting would remain firm. 

James Elmore Jr. trial: Jurors hear Elmore in recorded interview

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Opening statements began Tuesday in the James Elmore Jr. trial in Galveston County. By midday, jurors were hearing Elmore speak in a recorded interview with the detective who helped revive the decades-old investigation into Laura Miller’s death.

Prosecutors told jurors that Elmore knew details about Laura that had never been made public. They argue those details connect him to what happened to the 16-year-old more than 40 years ago.

Elmore has pleaded not guilty to manslaughter in Laura’s death.

Prosecutors say Elmore knew details about Laura Miller

Sign marking a recovery site featuring photos of four women and Clyde Hedrick during an investigation into multiple unsolved Texas homicide cases.
Memorial sign highlighting four victims whose cases have been linked to the same recovery site during the investigation into Clyde Hedrick and several unsolved homicides.

During opening statements, prosecutors focused on what Elmore allegedly told Laura’s father, Tim Miller.

The state said Elmore contacted Miller and told him he needed to get something off his chest. Miller later met with Elmore and drove around with him.

Prosecutors said Elmore directed Miller to Calder Road. He allegedly pointed out an area where he remembered dumping trash and seeing what he thought was a mannequin.

Laura’s remains were found near Calder Road in 1986.

Prosecutors also highlighted another detail they say Elmore could not have learned from news reports.

The state said Elmore knew Laura would skip school and spend time at a cemetery. He allegedly knew where she would sit among the trees.

Prosecutors said Tim Miller knew that detail because he had caught his daughter there before.

The state argues Elmore knew things that only someone with firsthand knowledge would know.

Watch: Detective Cory Williams questions James Elmore Jr.

Jurors heard portions of a recorded interview between Detective Cory Williams and James Elmore Jr. during Tuesday’s testimony. In the video below, viewers can hear Williams question Elmore directly about information surrounding Laura Miller and the investigation.

The court video is included as part of my podcast coverage so you can hear the exchange presented to the jury for yourself.

State describes alleged party before Laura Miller’s death

Prosecutors also gave jurors their account of a party they say took place before Laura died.

According to the state, Elmore said Laura was in a room with him, Clyde Hedrick and John Gorham.

Prosecutors said Elmore described Hedrick giving Laura cocaine. Elmore allegedly believed the amount was too much for the 16-year-old.

The state said Laura soon began flailing and removing her clothes.

Prosecutors told jurors Elmore said he and others eventually left the room. The state alleges Laura died sometime afterward.

The prosecution also told jurors that Elmore later helped move items from the house. Prosecutors say he described an arm falling out while something was being carried.

The defense reserved its opening statement.

Jurors hear about remains found near Calder Road

Recovery site at the Texas Killing Fields where victims were found along Calder Road in League City, Texas
Memorial crosses mark the Calder Road area where the remains of Laura Miller and Audrey Cook were found in 1986.

The first witnesses took jurors back to the area where Laura Miller and Audrey Cook were found in February 1986.

Testimony described the largely undeveloped Calder Road area as it appeared at the time.

Jurors also heard testimony about the condition of the remains and the autopsies.

Laura’s cause of death could not be determined from her skeletal remains. Testimony also addressed the limitations investigators faced because toxicology testing could no longer determine whether drugs played a role in her death.

Detective Corey Williams takes the stand

Hitchcock Police Detective Corey Williams testifies during the James Elmore Jr. trial.
Hitchcock Police Detective Corey Williams testifies in the James Elmore Jr. trial in Galveston County.

The case then moved to Hitchcock Police Detective Corey Williams.

Williams testified that he has worked in law enforcement for about 17 years. He said investigating cold cases involving missing women became a passion alongside his regular work as a detective.

Williams eventually met Tim Miller while working on other missing-person investigations.

That connection led him to James Elmore.

Williams told jurors that he did not initially consider Elmore a suspect.

Instead, investigators believed Elmore might have information about another case.

That changed during their interview.

Elmore’s interview changes direction of investigation

Booking photo of James Elmore Jr. displayed on an inmate detail card related to his criminal case.
James Elmore Jr. booking photo. His trial is currently scheduled to begin Aug. 31, 2026, in Galveston County.

Williams testified that Elmore began talking about other cases during the interview.

Then the conversation turned to a party and Laura Miller.

Williams said Elmore’s statements caused him to start looking at Elmore differently. He testified that he began considering Elmore a possible suspect in Laura’s death.

Williams then gathered records from several law enforcement agencies and investigated information Elmore provided.

He also traveled to Louisiana, Oklahoma and other parts of Texas while investigating information connected to the cases.

Jurors hear James Elmore in his own words

James Elmore Jr. in a Galveston County courtroom ahead of his manslaughter trial.
James Elmore Jr. appears in court ahead of his scheduled manslaughter trial in Galveston County.

Prosecutors then played Williams’ recorded interview with Elmore for the jury.

It marked a significant moment in the trial. Jurors could now hear Elmore describe events in his own voice.

During the recording, Elmore talks about the party where Laura was present.

He discusses drugs and describes Laura removing her clothes.

Investigators repeatedly question him about who remained in the room and what happened next.

Elmore says there were parts of the night he did not witness. He also says he did not see Laura being killed.

The interview then moves to what allegedly happened afterward.

Elmore talks about helping move items from a house. During one exchange, he describes an arm falling out of something being moved.

Investigators press him for more details about what he saw, who was there and where items were taken.

Elmore also discusses the Calder Road area and tells investigators he could show them the general location.

Recorded statements become key evidence

James Elmore Jr. appears in recorded video evidence shown during his trial in Galveston County.
Jurors watched recorded footage of James Elmore Jr. as prosecutors presented statements they say became key evidence in the Laura Miller case.

Williams testified that Elmore’s statements changed the course of his investigation.

Prosecutors are using Elmore’s own words to support their argument that he had knowledge about Laura, the party and events surrounding her death that he should not otherwise have known.

Elmore also denies witnessing Laura’s death during the recording and repeatedly tells investigators that he does not know exactly what happened during portions of the night.

Jurors will have to weigh those statements along with the physical evidence and testimony from other witnesses.

The James Elmore Jr. trial continues in Galveston County.

Judge allows key evidence as James Elmore Jr. trial begins

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Judge Jeff Jones presides over the James Elmore Jr. trial in Galveston County’s 122nd District Court.
Judge Jeff Jones during proceedings in the James Elmore Jr. trial in Galveston County.

A Galveston County judge made several key rulings Monday before jury selection in the James Elmore Jr. trial.

Elmore faces a manslaughter charge in the death of Laura Miller.

Miller disappeared in 1984. Searchers found her remains in 1986 near Calder Road in League City.

The area later became known as the Texas Killing Fields.

Elmore has pleaded not guilty.

Before the jury was even seated, key evidence revealed where the James Elmore Jr. trial may be headed. Watch the full video below.

Judge allows evidence involving Audrey Cook

Sign marking a recovery site featuring photos of four women and Clyde Hedrick during an investigation into multiple unsolved Texas homicide cases.
Memorial sign highlighting four victims whose cases have been linked to the same recovery site during the investigation into Clyde Hedrick and several unsolved homicides.

One major ruling involved Audrey Cook.

Searchers found Cook’s remains near Miller’s remains during the same search.

Prosecutors told the judge they want jurors to hear evidence about Cook’s remains and autopsy findings.

The state said Cook died from a gunshot wound. Investigators also recovered a bullet near her spine.

Prosecutors argued that the evidence could help corroborate statements they attribute to Elmore.

According to prosecutors, Elmore allegedly knew Cook had been shot while walking away.

The state said that information had not become public.

However, prosecutors told the judge they do not plan to argue that Elmore killed Cook.

Instead, they want to use the evidence to support their claim that Elmore had personal knowledge about Cook’s death.

Elmore’s attorney objected.

The defense argued that the evidence could unfairly prejudice jurors against Elmore.

The judge overruled the objection and allowed the evidence.

Karey Dodson testimony allowed

The judge also ruled on expected testimony from Karey Dodson.

Dodson lived with Tim and Laura Miller during the 1980s. She shared a room with Laura.

Dodson also knew Clyde Hedrick.

Prosecutors said Dodson could testify about interactions involving Hedrick and Elmore.

The state also wants Dodson to describe alleged threats connected to conversations about Laura Miller.

During Monday’s hearing, prosecutors referenced an alleged statement about having “killed before.”

The state argued that the testimony provides important context for the case.

Elmore’s attorney objected.

The defense argued that the testimony could unfairly prejudice jurors.

The judge overruled the objection.

The court will allow the state to present the testimony during its case.

Prosecutors also discussed allegations involving an attempted kidnapping.

The state said it does not plan to introduce that allegation during its case in chief. It could become relevant during the punishment phase if jurors convict Elmore.

Prosecutors disclose last-minute tip

Prosecutors and court staff during a pretrial hearing in the James Elmore Jr. case in Galveston County.
Prosecutors address the court ahead of jury selection in the James Elmore Jr. trial.

Prosecutors also told the judge about a last-minute tip.

An individual contacted the prosecutor’s office Thursday and claimed to have incriminating information about Elmore.

The person came to court Monday and spoke with prosecutors.

The state then disclosed the information to Elmore’s attorney.

Prosecutors told the judge they did not plan to use the information.

They also said they did not expect to call the person as a witness.

Elmore chooses jury to decide possible punishment

Elmore also made an important decision before jury selection.

James Elmore Jr. sits beside his attorney during pretrial proceedings in Galveston County.
James Elmore Jr. appears in court with his defense attorney before jury selection in his manslaughter trial.

His attorney filed paperwork asking the jury to determine punishment if jurors convict him.

Manslaughter carries a possible prison sentence of two to 20 years.

The same jury would decide Elmore’s sentence after a guilty verdict.

The decision also allowed attorneys to question potential jurors about punishment during jury selection.

Texas Killing Fields discussed before jury selection

Memorial cross at the Calder Road site in League City, an area associated with the Texas Killing Fields.
A memorial at the Calder Road site in League City, where several victims connected to the Texas Killing Fields were found.

Attorneys also discussed how much information they could give potential jurors about the case.

Prosecutors raised concerns about people who may already know about the Texas Killing Fields.

The judge said attorneys could provide basic facts to determine whether potential jurors had already formed an opinion.

Those facts included the names of Laura Miller and her father, Tim Miller.

Tim Miller founded Texas EquuSearch after his daughter’s murder.

Six people in the jury pool said they had worked with or volunteered for Texas EquuSearch.

Attorneys questioned potential jurors about whether they could remain fair and impartial.

13 jurors seated after hours of questioning

Galveston County courthouse where the James Elmore Jr. trial is taking place.
Outside the Galveston County courthouse ahead of proceedings in the James Elmore Jr. trial.

Jury selection continued for several hours Monday.

The court started with a pool of about 184 potential jurors.

Attorneys ultimately selected 13 people.

Seven women and six men were seated.

The court later confirmed that a woman will serve as the alternate.

That leaves the 12-person jury with six women and six men.

Opening statements begin Tuesday

Opening statements will begin at 9 a.m. Tuesday, Sept. 1.

The judge indicated that each side could receive up to 15 minutes for opening statements.

The state will then begin calling witnesses.

The prosecution’s witness list includes retired League City Police Officer Steven Cox. Cox worked the crime scene when searchers found Laura Miller’s remains in 1986.

The state also plans to call a former Galveston County Medical Examiner’s Office intern and current Galveston County Medical Examiner Dr. Erin Barnhart.

Karey Dodson also appears on the witness list.

Hitchcock Police Detective Cory Williams is another expected witness. Williams works with the Calder Road Killing Field Task Force.

Tim Miller, Laura Miller’s father and the founder of Texas EquuSearch, also appears on the state’s witness list.

The defense did not submit a witness list and currently does not plan to call witnesses.

The trial could continue through the week.

ChopperRose.com will continue following the James Elmore Jr. trial as testimony gets underway.

James Elmore Jr. trial: Tim Miller expected to testify

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Tim Miller, father of Laura Miller and founder of Texas EquuSearch, shown in a Galveston County courtroom.
Tim Miller, father of Laura Miller and founder of Texas EquuSearch, shown in a Galveston County courtroom.

The James Elmore Jr. trial moves into testimony Tuesday in Galveston County.

The court released Tuesday’s schedule.

Prosecutors expect Tim Miller to testify. Miller is Laura Miller’s father and the founder of Texas EquuSearch.

His testimony could become one of the most closely watched moments of the trial.

Tim Miller expected to take the stand

Tim Miller, father of Laura Miller and founder of Texas EquuSearch, speaking during an interview.
Tim Miller has spent decades searching for answers in the death of his daughter, Laura Miller. He is expected to be the prosecution’s first witness in the James Elmore Jr. trial.

Miller spent years searching for answers about his daughter’s death.

More recently, he had repeated contact with Elmore.

Miller has said he met privately with Elmore dozens of times after Elmore approached him with information about Laura’s death. Those conversations eventually became part of the renewed investigation. 

Prosecutors expect Miller to testify about those contacts with Elmore.

Elmore faces a manslaughter charge in Laura Miller’s death.

He pleaded not guilty. 

Opening statements expected Tuesday

James Elmore Jr. in a Galveston County courtroom ahead of his manslaughter trial.
James Elmore Jr. appears in court ahead of his scheduled manslaughter trial in Galveston County.

Proceedings are scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. Tuesday, Sept. 1.

The court will formally read the charge before opening statements.

Assistant District Attorney Katelyn Willis will give the prosecution’s opening statement. Willis leads the Violence Against Women Division.

ADA Adam Poole also represents the state. He leads the Felony Division but will not give an opening statement.

Defense attorney William “Bill” Agnew is not expected to give an opening statement immediately after the prosecution, according to the current schedule.

Manslaughter case goes before jury first

James Elmore Jr. stands with attorneys before Judge Jeth Jones in the 122nd District Court in Galveston County.
James Elmore Jr. appears in the 122nd District Court ahead of his manslaughter trial in the death of Laura Miller.

Elmore is charged with manslaughter in connection with Laura Miller’s death and with two counts of tampering with evidence involving the remains of Laura Miller and Audrey Cook.

He has pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Trial expected to continue through Friday

James Elmore Jr. stands in the 122nd District Court with attorneys ahead of his manslaughter trial in Galveston County.
James Elmore Jr. appears in court as proceedings move toward testimony in the manslaughter case involving Laura Miller’s death.

The court currently expects testimony to continue through Friday, Sept. 4.

Proceedings are scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. each day and conclude around 5 p.m.

The schedule could change depending on testimony and other issues that arise during the trial.

I will continue following the James Elmore Jr. trial and will report new developments as they happen.

Traveling to Galveston County?

Visitors following the trial can compare lodging options through Hotels.com.

Long courthouse days can also mean keeping phones and reporting equipment charged. Courtroom and travel essentials are available through Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Earlier coverage: Read what happened during Elmore’s pretrial hearing and why the judge said the Aug. 31 setting would remain firm.

James Elmore Jr. trial begins Monday in Galveston County

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

James Elmore Jr. in a Galveston County courtroom ahead of his manslaughter trial.
James Elmore Jr. appears in court ahead of his scheduled manslaughter trial in Galveston County.

The James Elmore Jr. trial is set to begin Monday in Galveston County.

Elmore faces a manslaughter charge in connection with the death of Laura Miller.

The case is scheduled in the 122nd District Court.

The court has already warned attorneys that it does not expect another delay without a serious emergency. 

Jury selection could draw a large crowd

Jury selection may become one of the first major hurdles in the case.

During an earlier pretrial hearing, the judge and attorneys discussed calling more than 200 prospective jurors because of the publicity surrounding the case. 

The court also discussed using a larger courtroom.

Attorneys considered a written jury questionnaire and individual questioning for some prospective jurors. The goal is to determine whether jurors can decide the case only on evidence presented in court. 

Manslaughter case will go first

Booking photo of James Elmore Jr. displayed on an inmate detail card related to his criminal case.
James Elmore Jr. booking photo. His trial is currently scheduled to begin Aug. 31, 2026, in Galveston County.

Prosecutors previously told the judge they plan to try the manslaughter case first.

Elmore has several other criminal cases pending.

The state has said evidence connected to some of those cases could become relevant during the manslaughter trial. If Elmore is convicted, prosecutors could also seek to introduce additional evidence during the punishment phase. 

Watch the pretrial hearing

I previously covered Elmore’s Aug. 21 pretrial hearing, where the judge and attorneys discussed jury selection, outstanding discovery and how the manslaughter case would move forward.

Watch my full video from the hearing below for more context before Monday’s trial.

When testimony could begin

The court previously discussed beginning jury selection Monday afternoon.

Opening statements and testimony could begin Tuesday if a jury is seated in time. Attorneys have estimated the trial could last about one week. 

That timeline could change depending on how long jury selection takes.

What to watch Monday

The biggest questions heading into court are how large the jury pool will be, whether attorneys use questionnaires and how quickly they can seat a jury.

There could also be last-minute motions before testimony begins.

Chopper Rose Productions will be at the courthouse following developments as the case moves toward trial.

Traveling to Galveston County?

Visitors following the trial can compare lodging options through Hotels.com.

Long courthouse days can also mean keeping phones and reporting equipment charged. Courtroom and travel essentials are available through Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Earlier coverage: Read what happened during Elmore’s pretrial hearing and why the judge said the Aug. 31 setting would remain firm.

Jodi Arias PCR deadline moved to 2027 after judge grants extension

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

A judge has given Jodi Arias nearly five more months to prepare her post-conviction relief petition.

The court moved the Jodi Arias PCR deadline from Sept. 2, 2026, to Jan. 29, 2027.

The decision ends weeks of uncertainty over whether Arias would have to file her long-awaited petition within days.

Her defense had argued that medical problems, unfinished investigative work and unresolved evidence made the September deadline impossible to meet.

Prosecutors opposed the request.

Judge grants Jodi Arias more time

Defense attorney Christopher Stavris asked for the extension in June.

He told the court that several members of the defense team faced serious medical issues.

Those problems included surgeries, extended medical leave and limited work schedules.

The defense argued that those circumstances slowed its investigation and preparation.

The judge ultimately agreed to give the team more time.

Arias now has until Jan. 29, 2027, to file her PCR petition.

What the extension does — and does not do

The ruling does not overturn Arias’ conviction.

It does not grant her a new trial.

It also does not reduce her sentence.

The order only gives her defense team additional time to prepare the petition.

That petition is expected to outline the legal grounds Arias plans to use to challenge her conviction or sentence.

Mystery evidence could still become important

One unanswered issue involves an unidentified piece of evidence.

Defense filings say the issue involves the State, the Mesa Police Department or both.

The filings do not publicly identify the evidence.

They also do not explain whether the item still exists or what information it may contain.

The defense says it requested information about the evidence months ago.

That issue could become more important once the PCR petition is filed.

Prosecutors wanted the September deadline to stay

Prosecutor Juan Martinez walking into court beside a witness during Jodi Arias’s resentencing proceedings.
Prosecutor Juan Martinez walks into court with a witness during Jodi Arias’s resentencing trial.

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office opposed giving Arias additional time.

Prosecutors argued that she had already received years to prepare her petition.

Arias filed her PCR notice in February 2021.

The State also argued that the defense could file the petition by the existing deadline and later seek permission to amend it.

The court rejected that position and granted the extension.

What happens next in the Jodi Arias case?

Jodi Arias seated in an Arizona courtroom during proceedings in her murder case.
Jodi Arias appears in court during proceedings in her Arizona murder case.

The next major deadline is now Jan. 29, 2027.

That is when Arias must file her PCR petition unless the court changes the schedule again.

Once that petition is filed, the public may finally learn which claims her defense plans to raise.

It could also provide more information about the unidentified evidence mentioned in earlier court filings.

Arias was convicted in 2013 of killing Travis Alexander in his Mesa home.

She is serving a natural-life sentence without the possibility of release.

For now, the conviction remains in place.

The next major development will likely come from the PCR petition itself or another court order before the January deadline.

Follow the Jodi Arias case

Chopper Rose Productions will continue tracking new court filings and developments in the Jodi Arias post-conviction case.

Planning a trip?

If your travels take you to Phoenix or elsewhere, compare available rooms and rates through Hotels.com.

Affiliate disclosure: I may earn a commission if you book through this link, at no additional cost to you.

Shop related books

Book cover for Conviction by Juan Martinez about the Jodi Arias murder trial.
Conviction by former prosecutor Juan Martinez examines the Jodi Arias murder case and trial.

Explore books about the Jodi Arias case, courtroom trials and true crime through Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Jodi Arias gets more time to file post-conviction challenge

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Jodi Arias will not have to file her long-awaited post-conviction relief petition next week.

A judge has granted Arias more time to prepare the petition challenging her murder conviction. The new order moves the Jodi Arias PCR deadline from September 2, 2026, to January 29, 2027.

The ruling gives Arias and her defense team nearly five additional months. Prosecutors had strongly opposed the extension.

Judge extends Jodi Arias PCR deadline

Defense attorney Christopher Stavris requested the extension in June.

He told the court that serious medical problems had disrupted the defense team’s work. One key team member needs more than three months of leave for surgery. Another team member also needs surgery and can only work in a limited role.

Two other team members face significant health problems. The defense may also need to replace another member because of continuing medical issues.

Stavris argued that those problems created extraordinary circumstances. He said the team could not complete its investigation before September 2.

The judge has now given the defense until January 29, 2027, to file Arias’ PCR petition.

Mystery evidence remains unresolved

The defense also says it still awaits information about an unidentified piece of evidence.

Court filings do not publicly describe that item. However, the defense says the issue involves the State, the Mesa Police Department or both.

Arias’ attorneys say they first requested information about the evidence nearly one year ago. They argue that they need answers before completing the PCR petition.

The filings do not explain whether the evidence still exists, what it may contain or how it could affect Arias’ claims.

Those questions remain unresolved.

Prosecutors fought the extension

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office urged the judge to keep the September deadline.

Prosecutors argued that Arias has already received years to prepare her petition. She filed her PCR notice on February 11, 2021.

The State said the September deadline gave her more than five and a half years to finish the filing. Prosecutors also argued that Arias could file the petition and request permission to amend it later.

The State took an even stronger position in its response. Prosecutors argued that missing the September deadline could support dismissal of Arias’ PCR notice.

Despite those objections, the court gave the defense more time.

What happens next in the Jodi Arias case?

Arias must now file her PCR petition by January 29, 2027.

That petition should identify the legal grounds she plans to use to challenge her conviction or sentence. It may also reveal more about the mystery evidence mentioned in recent court filings.

Arias was convicted in 2013 of murdering Travis Alexander inside his Mesa home. She is serving a natural-life sentence with no possibility of release.

The new order does not overturn her conviction or grant her a new trial. It only gives her defense team more time to file the petition seeking post-conviction relief.

For now, the biggest questions remain unanswered.

What is the unidentified evidence? What happened to it? And how does the defense believe it could affect one of Arizona’s most closely watched murder cases?

Planning a trip?

If your travels take you to Phoenix or anywhere else, compare available rooms and rates through Hotels.com.

Affiliate disclosure: I may earn a commission if you book through this link, at no additional cost to you.

Shop related books

Explore books about the Jodi Arias case, courtroom trials and true crime through Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Texas AG rules on records in Rebecca Beard investigation

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Texas Attorney General ruling on Rebecca “Becky” Beard investigation records, with Beard’s photo, Texas Capitol and case file graphic.
The Texas Attorney General ruled Aug. 28, 2026, that Brazoria County may withhold investigative information tied to the Rebecca “Becky” Beard case, but must release basic information.

More records in the decades-old Rebecca “Becky” Beard case will remain out of public view for now.

The Texas Attorney General issued a new ruling Aug. 28 allowing Brazoria County to withhold investigative information because authorities say it relates to an ongoing criminal case.

But the ruling comes with an important exception.

Brazoria County must release the basic information.

I have already requested it.

New ruling in the Rebecca Beard records investigation

Rebecca “Becky” Beard holding her daughter before her 1986 disappearance
Rebecca “Becky” Beard pictured with her daughter before Becky disappeared from Freeport, Texas, in March 1986.

Beard was 22 when she disappeared after leaving the Excalibur Club in Freeport in March 1986.

Her body has never been recovered.

Paul Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty in 1995 in connection with her death, but questions surrounding the case have continued for decades.

My investigation has included multiple public information requests seeking Brazoria County records connected to the case.

Those requests have now resulted in another Attorney General ruling.

Brazoria County says the criminal case is ongoing

The Aug. 28 decision provides an important detail about the current status of the investigation.

According to the Attorney General, Brazoria County said a law enforcement agency objected to releasing the information because it “relates to an ongoing criminal case.”

The county argued that releasing the records could interfere with that case.

The Attorney General agreed that the investigative information may be withheld under Section 552.108(a)(1) of the Texas Government Code.

However, the ruling also says the county must release basic information under Section 552.108(c).

Eight Brazoria County records requests included in ruling

The Attorney General combined eight Brazoria County reference numbers in the decision:

26-1859, 26-1865, 26-1874, 26-1933, 26-1947, 26-1950, 26-1991 and 26-2012.

The Attorney General assigned the matter request ID 26-033498.

The Aug. 28 decision is OR2026-038106.

What will Brazoria County release?

That is now the question.

The ruling does not mean Brazoria County must turn over the entire investigative file.

It does mean the county cannot withhold everything.

I have submitted a follow-up request seeking the basic information that the Attorney General says must be released.

Once those records arrive, I will review them and report what they reveal.

After 40 years, the Rebecca Beard case continues to generate new questions — and the state now confirms that authorities still consider the matter tied to an ongoing criminal case.

Read the Attorney General ruling

I have included the Aug. 28, 2026 Texas Attorney General ruling connected to these Brazoria County records requests below.

The ruling, OR2026-038106, says the county may withhold investigative information tied to the ongoing criminal case, but must release basic information.

Texas Attorney General ruling OR2026-038106

Visiting Brazoria County?

For readers traveling to Brazoria County for court proceedings, research or other business, Hotels.com can help compare accommodations throughout the area and along the Texas Gulf Coast.

This post may contain affiliate links. I may earn a commission from qualifying bookings at no additional cost to you.

Tools for digging through public records

Public-records investigations often mean sorting through court filings, police reports, photographs and hundreds of pages of documents. Amazon has portable scanners, external drives, document organizers and other tools that can help keep large research projects organized.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Brazoria County seeks to withhold records tied to 2026 Rebecca Beard investigation

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Rebecca Beard pictured before her disappearance in Texas in 1986.
Texas Department of Public Safety missing person bulletin for Rebecca “Becky” Beard, who disappeared in 1986.

Brazoria County seeks to withhold Rebecca Beard records

Brazoria County prosecutors are asking the Texas Attorney General for permission to withhold records connected to the renewed investigation into the 1986 disappearance and murder of Rebecca “Becky” Beard.

The August 25 filing also reveals new details about the investigation.

Prosecutors confirmed investigators examined information involving possible additional suspects in Beard’s murder. They also confirmed investigators recently presented their findings to a Brazoria County grand jury.

The grand jury took no action.

Records request targeted 2026 investigation

I submitted a Texas Public Information Act request on August 10 seeking records related to the 2026 investigation.

The request focused on information provided by Cherie Starr, also known as “Rio.”

I requested interviews, statements, reports, recordings, photographs, maps and investigative notes connected to Starr’s information.

I also sought records concerning any location Starr identified as a possible site for Beard’s remains or other evidence.

The request included records involving a possible search, excavation or dig.

I also requested communications between the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office, Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office, Texas Rangers and other law enforcement agencies.

Importantly, the request did not seek secret grand jury testimony, deliberations, voting records or juror identities.

Brazoria County confirms responsive records exist

The District Attorney’s Office confirmed it holds records that respond to the request.

However, prosecutors want to withhold those records in their entirety.

In its August 25 letter to the Texas Attorney General, the DA’s Office cited the law-enforcement exception under Section 552.108 of the Texas Government Code.

Prosecutors argue that Beard’s murder investigation remains open because her body has never been recovered.

They contend releasing the requested records could interfere with that continuing investigation.

Filing reveals investigation of possible additional suspects

The filing provides an important glimpse into what happened during the renewed investigation.

Prosecutors wrote that their office had recently investigated “other possible actors/defendants” in Beard’s murder.

According to the filing, investigators presented those findings to a Brazoria County grand jury.

The DA’s Office said the grand jury took no action because investigators did not develop other credible suspects.

That disclosure provides new information about the scope of the 2026 investigation.

It shows investigators did more than simply review an old case file. They examined whether other people may have played a role in Beard’s murder and brought those findings before a grand jury.

Paul Taylor was convicted, but Becky remains missing

John Paul Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty in 1995 to murdering Beard.

Beard was 22 when she disappeared in March 1986.

Her body has never been recovered.

The DA’s filing cites that fact as one reason the murder investigation remains open. Prosecutors argue law enforcement must remain able to investigate credible new leads if they emerge.

Prosecutors also claim attorney work-product protection

The District Attorney’s Office makes another argument for withholding the records.

Prosecutors say the requested investigative notes and materials contain attorney work product.

According to the filing, a DA investigator prepared the records while working at the direction of an appointed special prosecutor.

The DA argues the documents contain investigative strategy, mental impressions and legal reasoning connected to potential criminal litigation.

For those reasons, prosecutors asked the Attorney General to allow them to withhold all of the responsive records.

The Attorney General will decide

The August 25 filing is not a final ruling on my records request.

It is Brazoria County’s argument for why the records should remain confidential.

The Texas Attorney General’s Office will now review the arguments and determine whether state law allows Brazoria County to withhold the requested material.

The decision could allow the county to withhold the records, require the release of some information, or require additional responsive material to be released.

I will continue following the records dispute and the investigation into what happened to Rebecca Beard.

The public records request and Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office filing to the Texas Attorney General are attached below.

Planning a trip to Brazoria County?

If you are traveling to Brazoria County to follow developments in the Rebecca Beard case, you can compare hotel options through Hotels.com. Look for rooms near Angleton, Lake Jackson, Freeport or the surrounding area, depending on your plans.

I may earn a commission from qualifying Hotels.com bookings made through my link, at no additional cost to you.

What to bring for a long reporting day

Court records, interviews and long hours on the road can mean a lot of waiting. A portable phone charger, reusable water bottle and lightweight bag can make the day easier. You can find travel gear and everyday reporting essentials on Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

James Elmore Jr. Trial Set for Aug. 31 in Galveston County

James Elmore Jr. appears in court during a pretrial hearing ahead of his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.

James Elmore Jr. Trial Set for Aug. 31 as Judge Signals No Continuance

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

James Elmore Jr. remains on track for an Aug. 31 trial in Galveston County.

Elmore pleaded not guilty as his case moves toward a jury. He faces several criminal cases connected to the deaths linked to the area known as the Texas Killing Fields.

Texas EquuSearch founder Tim Miller was also present in the courtroom.

Texas EquuSearch founder Tim Miller sits in the courtroom during James Elmore Jr.’s pretrial hearing ahead of the Aug. 31 trial.

During a pretrial discussion, the judge made one point especially clear. The court intends to try the case as scheduled.

“Unless there’s some medical emergency … no continuance.”

The judge told attorneys to make sure everyone understands that the case has a firm trial setting.

James Elmore Jr. Manslaughter Case Will Go First

Watch the full James Elmore Jr. pretrial hearing above, including discussion of the Aug. 31 trial date, jury selection, discovery and the other pending cases.

Elmore currently has five pending cases, according to statements made in court.

The prosecution told the judge that it plans to try the manslaughter case first on Aug. 31.

The state said it no longer plans to first try newer cases involving allegations of possession of child pornography.

The court also discussed Elmore’s other pending cases.

Prosecutors said the tampering cases could become relevant during the manslaughter trial. They argued that some of that evidence may provide context involving the victim.

If a jury finds Elmore guilty of manslaughter, prosecutors could also introduce evidence from the other pending cases during the punishment phase.

The judge explained that process in court.

If jurors find Elmore not guilty, the remaining cases would still remain pending.

Attorneys Say Discovery Is Nearly Complete

James Elmore Jr. and attorneys appear before the judge during a pretrial hearing ahead of his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.

Both sides told the judge that no major discovery issues remain.

Prosecutors said they still need to handle several smaller matters. Those include redactions to statements and identifying specific jail calls.

The state also has images stored on a hard drive.

Defense attorneys can review those materials at the prosecutor’s office.

Elmore’s attorney told the judge that he plans to review the material while preparing for trial.

The court also discussed a discovery compliance form. Defense counsel said he would have Elmore review and sign it.

Court Could Call More Than 200 Potential Jurors

Jury selection could become one of the biggest challenges in the James Elmore Jr. trial.

The case has received extensive media coverage.

The judge and attorneys discussed calling more than 200 prospective jurors because of the attention surrounding the case.

The court could use a larger courtroom to accommodate the panel.

Attorneys also discussed whether to use a written jury questionnaire.

A questionnaire could help identify people who already know details about the case. However, it could also delay jury selection by a day.

The judge raised another concern.

Questions asked in front of the entire panel could influence other potential jurors. The court may instead question some people individually.

The goal will be to find jurors who can decide the case based only on evidence presented in court.

Judge Expects Trial to Last About One Week

James Elmore Jr. stands with attorneys during a pretrial hearing in Galveston County ahead of his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.
James Elmore Jr. appears with attorneys during a pretrial hearing as the court prepares for his Aug. 31 trial.

The attorneys told the judge they expect the manslaughter trial to last about one week.

The court discussed beginning jury selection on the afternoon of Aug. 31.

Opening statements and testimony could begin the following day.

If the court uses a jury questionnaire, the trial could run slightly longer.

The court also expects to select alternate jurors.

Other James Elmore Cases Could Follow Quickly

Booking photo of James Elmore Jr. displayed on an inmate detail card related to his criminal case.
James Elmore Jr. booking photo. His trial is currently scheduled to begin Aug. 31, 2026, in Galveston County.

Prosecutors are already looking beyond the Aug. 31 trial.

The state told the judge it wants to return to court quickly for another Elmore case.

An October trial setting came up during the discussion.

The court discussed Oct. 5 as a possible next docket setting. Attorneys also mentioned Oct. 12 as another possibility.

Those dates could change depending on how long the manslaughter trial lasts and how quickly attorneys receive the court record.

Judge Warns Elmore Against Speaking

James Elmore Jr. stands beside his attorney and a courtroom deputy during a Galveston County pretrial hearing.
James Elmore Jr. stands with his attorney during a pretrial hearing as the court prepares for his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.

The judge also addressed Elmore directly.

He told Elmore that he did not have to speak in court. The judge warned that anything Elmore said could become evidence against him.

Instead, the judge encouraged Elmore to communicate with his attorney about anything he wants addressed before trial.

The judge said the court would hear necessary motions, even if attorneys file them shortly before trial.

Aug. 31 Trial Remains Firm

For now, the most important development is simple.

James Elmore Jr. remains scheduled for trial Aug. 31.

The prosecution says it will begin with the manslaughter case.

The court expects a large jury pool because of the publicity surrounding the case.

And the judge made clear that he does not expect to grant another delay without a serious emergency.

Tim Miller’s presence in the courtroom also underscored the attention surrounding the case as it moves closer to trial.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose will continue following the James Elmore Jr. case and any developments before jury selection begins.

Traveling to Texas for the James Elmore Jr. Trial?

Hotel swimming pool in Galveston, Texas, for travelers visiting Galveston County.
Travelers heading to Galveston County can compare hotel options near the courthouse and surrounding area.

If you are traveling to Galveston County to follow the James Elmore Jr. trial, you can compare hotel options through Hotels.com. Look for rooms near Galveston, League City or the surrounding area, depending on your travel plans and court schedule.

What to Pack for a Court Trip

Long court days can mean a lot of waiting. I recommend bringing a portable phone charger, reusable water bottle and a lightweight bag for your essentials. You can find travel gear and courtroom-day basics on Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Making memories that'll last a lifetime!